Anand Jon: gone but not forgotten

Americans, suggests Easy Rawlins creator Walter Mosley in an essay for a Newsweek special issue [which, incidentally, makes for good reading], is obsessed with true crime.

Americans are not the only ones: I’ve been following, fairly obsessively, the Anand Jon case since his March 2007 arrest through the November 2008 jury verdict and last week’s sentencing by LA Superior Court Judge David Wesley – and I’m damned if I’ve come across a more tangled tale.

Like Mosley’s Americans, I like my heroes squeaky clean and my villains doom black, but the Jon case, playing out against the background of the colourful world of haute fashion, is painted in shades of unfashionable gray.

Is Anand Jon a designer more intent in creating an image [he at one time claimed to be a protégé of no less than Giorgio Armani – a claim the label was quick to refute] than in creating clothes?

Is he a hubris-ridden arriviste [his ‘I am my own God’ line gave prosecutors a compelling beginning for the opening statement] whose sense of entitlement turned him into a sociopath, or unwitting road kill in the path of a bunch of women looking for an easy route to the top?

Or does the truth lie somewhere in the middle of those two extremes?

I have no personal knowledge of the man outside of a handful of ‘same party, same place, same time’ encounters; sister Sanjana I ‘know’ in the ‘hello darling how’re you doing muah-muah we really must do a dinner one of these days’ way, but no more.

Absent personal knowledge, I’ve been following the case through the reportage, such as there is, on the internet – and available matter in the public domain throws up more questions than there are answers.

A favorite resource has been the reporting [her magazine feature for here] and blog [Waxman’s trial-related posts here] of Sharon Waxman, and of the LA Post’s Steve Mikulan [post sentencing summation here, earlier Full Court Press posts here]. Here are two fairly extended pieces on the case, and the man; and here’s Manish Vij summing up recent stories.

The sense you get is that at various times, the prosecution stuffed up and so did the defense; that there is likely a fair degree of exaggeration in some of the victims’ accounts but also enough truth to suggest that Jon deserved to get it in the neck the way he did. [Besides the evidentiary weight the jury gave the testimony of some victims while rejecting the inconsistent testimonies of others, there is among lesser reported themes the point that some of the instances of sexual contact date back to 2004 – and in those, Jon was in violation of the terms of his probation after a nolo contendere plea to a charge of child abuse in 2003].

What leaves a bad taste in the mouth is the post-verdict media blitz mounted by Sanjana. Television viewing wasn’t among my priorities last week, but I did catch a bit of her shtick on NDTV vis a vis Rajdeep Sardesai, where among other arguments, she suggested that in one instance, the victim was 17 years and six months old, and hence could not be called a child – ergo, her brother was innocent.

Huh? Duh!

Getting everybody and his uncle KJ Jesudoss to speak out for Jon is one thing, but over the top doesn’t even begin to describe some of Sanjana’s antics following Jon’s incarceration. Like the time she walked the ramp at Fashion Week in New Delhi.

“I did it for Anand,” says Sanjana. “The fact that I can be a model and walk the ramp is a statement that I want to make to the other models. If I’m gonna dress for the ramp, somebody is going to touch me and if I turn around and accuse him of inappropriate touching – it’s ridiculous. I want those models (who’ve accused Anand) to get the message that I walked the ramp too.”

Again, duh! Jon wasn’t being accused of coming into contact with a model while adjusting her costume ahead of a fashion show – so what precisely this little stunt was supposed to prove is beyond me.

There is also the ‘racism’ charge, which has played out as a percussive undercurrent to the proceedings ever since Jon was arrested. Mercifully, the Indian American has largely steered clear of that one, despite the family’s best efforts to suggest that the designer is being victimized only because he is an Indian.

While on the India connection, back in 2007 Manu Joseph [now with Open magazine] reminisced about the boy he had known in college. What Manu diplomatically left out is the story that was pretty much general currency at the time — that Jon had knocked up the teen daughter of a very prominent business family, and had to flee in the face of the family’s wrath.

Anyway. This morning, an email landed up in media inboxes. As below:

Hello Everybody,

It’s time to prevail justice.

We need yourself and your help to SAVE a life of young Indo- American man of age of 32.

After loosing Big cases of OJ and other Celebrities DA of Los Angeles County FRAMED Celebrity to SHOW public that they are DOING something.

Let’s raise your voice for justice and save INNOCENT victim from Rape charges. No doubt Judge Wesley has given “”PRE MEDITATE” judgement to support DA’s office to retain credibility as District Attorney.

The DA’s Office have been fall short fighting against Rich people’s attorneys and at the same time revenge is taken out to Innocent Victim because he does not have fund to hire attorneys.

Who is the judge? A judicial politician who gets thousands and thousands of dollars to fight election to be elected judge. Let’s open the diary of donors to judge Wesley.

Let’s march – Let’s have candle light visual – Let’s FAST in front of DA’s office to prevail justice. If DA’s office so sure why not have re-trial? OR DA’s office does not want the golden opportunity given by Judge Wesley to punish Anand Jon Alexander

Friends, If you love humanity and you love justice Anand Jon Alexander deserves your support.

As Mahatma Gandhi said ” If you can not use your power for betterment of Human life that is ok but Do not destroy human life” Here, Pre meditate judgement of Judge Wesley is destroying upcoming a human life.

The time is an essence and action needs now. Can Anand count on your support?

Please circulate whom you love and whom you trust to prevail justice and Human life.

Fairly hysterical, ditto illiterate – and surprisingly, it comes from Sanjana’s personal email ID. The prose is in stark contrast to earlier emails that, while over the top in some of the allegations made, are characterized by much better phrasing.

At some point there is apt to be an appeal. Hopefully it will be fought on the evidence, and not on hype and hysteria. Hopefully, too, Anand will take a cue from this Sepia Mutiny post.

A clip, finally, from Waxman’s magazine article:

In Los Angeles, 20 of these women have made formal complaints against Anand Jon, resulting in 59 criminal counts, including forci-ble rape, sex-ual penetration by a foreign object, sexual exploitation of a child, sexual battery, and forcible oral copulation. The women say he did these things between 2001 and 2007. Some say they were as young as 14 or 15 when it happened and that he gave them alcohol. Several say they were raped repeatedly and in more than one city. The charges made headlines. Whatever the outcome of his trial here in Los Angeles, which could begin as soon as the end of August, Jon will face still more charges in New York and Texas.

In many of the cases against him, small-town values will collide with big-city realities, especially in the slippery sphere of cyberspace. Meet a girl, diss a guy, seek your fortune on the World Wide Web, and it can have devastating consequences. With a few keyboard strokes Jon found women, ping-ing them through MySpace or on sites such as and Some entered his circle, and when their quest for renown ended, they reached back through the Web to find other former models who felt aggrieved or said they had sex with him.

What these women told grand jurors exposed the world of semicelebrity. Anand Jon was a promising young designer, but he was no Tom Ford, and his ac-cusers are not from the covers of Vogue. They both are from the Los Angeles culture of the nearly known, the almost there, drawn to ac-claim and made aware of the jagged edge just beneath its surface. Some people under-stand this well. Marla Maples, the sometime actress and ex-wife of Donald Trump, is a close friend of Anand Jon. She calls him “one of the most inspiring people I’ve ever met.” The women blaming him, Maples told me, are “not comfortable in their own skin.” As a girl from Dalton, Georgia, she says, “it breaks my heart to see this need we have to be famous. It’s very addictive.”

15 thoughts on “Anand Jon: gone but not forgotten

    • Anand is quite handsome.From my knowledge of him,he was a casanova,a flirt and a charmer.Rapist?No way.he was the kind who would charm you into submission..Those girls seem to be paid to make these charges.anand has been framed.

  1. prempanicker, a malayali is jelous about handsome men like Arvind Swamy or Anand Jon etc can be understood. For, his mother tongue is malayalam or malayali. Go to hell , you shit.

  2. I believe that the allegations are true. I talked on the phone with anand when I was 16 years old. He talked about me meeting him and he also talked about Kama sutra a lot. He didn’t want to make me a model and I wasn’t interested in that anyway but he wanted me to meet him. After I told my parents they became furious that a man in his mid twenties wanted to date a 16 year old.
    I’m glad I wasn’t allowed talk to him or meet him after that.

  3. u r cruel
    u r not humanbeing
    ur not my friend
    tum agar mere friend ho to mujhe tum mail kyuon nahi karte ho,sach tumahere upar bahat gussa aa raha hai,maine itna sara mail kya aur tumne ek bhi mail nahi kya kyon,ho kya gaya hai tumko,had ho gaye,ab to tumko na marne ka dil karta hai,samjhe,ek friend dusre friend ka halat nahi samjhta hai,tum na mere se umar me bare ho,tumko jyada samajh me ana chayeee, what can i say u know very well,so give me call my cell no is 9832089791,aur me ab kya karoo ,tum mujhe milne ke liyeee jaldi ayoooo,samjhe,ab aur intezar nahi hota hai samjhe my dear

  4. dear now a days my mood is very bad,why,coz u dont response my mail,ur friend tell u ,u plz come to my home,truly i feel very insequred,ok my dear its not jokes,are u need me?yes or no, my parents very disturbing me,
    plz contact me,
    reshmi saha

  5. are u busy now a days?miss u my friend,if u wish u send me mail, i love u dear,how are u?many times i mail u but u dont send me any kind of mail,why?when i need u that time i dont beside my side,wish u a very happy valentine day for u,for the date of 14th february,hope u meet me that day,if u love me send me a mail ,ifeel happy,i have no words,best of luck for ur carrier,bye
    reshmi saha

  6. I dont know about hanging out in front of the principals office, but what I remember of Anand, he was always surrounded by frickin hot chicks.

    Loyola still does attract VIP kids.

  7. Anand Jon studied at Loyola – around the same time when I too went to that college. I do not recollect anything about whatever was written in Manu Joseph’s article. The only person I recollect from that batch is Vijay – the Tamil film actor.

    And, of course those Vis Comm girls – they were the cynosure of all eyes since they were the only ones who belonged to that sex. It was a first of sorts at Loyola that year as Vis Comm and the PG programs admitted women.

    But Bon Jovi like Anand coveting nubile somethings in front of the Princi’s office? Nah – I don’t think such a thing would have happened. Even Stalin’s son and other VIP kids knew to behave on campus. The college management was least tolerant to deviant behaviour.

    • Strange thing is, another friend who was in Loyola at that time and in the same batch has different memories, more closely aligned with that of Manu, as he was telling me in mail yesterday. Oh well. BTW, you appear to have had some illustrious collegemates — Vijay, Stalin… 🙂

      • Maybe I was too studious to have noted Anand!! 🙂

        yeah – lots of people from Loyola around that time – Viswanathan Anand, Arvindswamy, Vijay, Surya, Udhayanithi, SJ Surya (the Tamil film director), etc.

        Loyola used to attract the top names in academics as well as star value – not sure if they still do!

  8. The US justice is not perfect but still a good one. In this system there is a heavy burden on the prosecution to prove that the accused is guilty. Even after being convicted if there was really a miscarriage of justice, Anand Jon still can appeal to a higher court and review all the evidence that was presented in the trial court.

    Very Recently the Supreme Court stopped a death sentence from going ahead after several witnesses recanted their testimony that they gave in the orginal trial.

  9. When the case first came up, I came across a piece by a former Chennai college mate of his–describing Anand as a typical vain Campus Casanova, with girls fawning around him. It gave a lot of insights into his persona. It was either a blog post or online article. I tried googling it when the verdict came but couldnt find it. Anybody recall reading it, do share the link.To me that piece, and the verdict are pretty conclusive. Allegations of racism, and maria maples ludicrous “doing it for fame” allegation are plain wrong. It’s not one accusation. I’ts several girls, at different times.

Comments are closed.